Layer 2s Secure $37B as Ethereum's Architecture Revolution Unfolds

The Layer 1 wars are heating up, but not in the way you think.

Solana's throughput is pulling institutional capital while Ethereum's L2 ecosystem balloons to $37 billion in secured value. Meanwhile, DeFi is shedding its rebel reputation for something more pragmatic—call it Neo Finance—and AI is quietly threading itself into blockchain infrastructure just as Bank of America opens the door to crypto allocations.

Four stories, one throughline: the infrastructure layer is consolidating, specializing, and growing up fast.

Let's get into it.

As always, feel free to send us feedback at [email protected].

Layer 1 competition is less a contest of ideology than a relentless pursuit of performance, and Solana is quickly mastering the craft.

With transaction speeds frequently topping 50,000 TPS and costs that undercut Ethereum by orders of magnitude, Solana $SOL ( ▼ 0.25% ) is courting the very users its predecessor cannot: high-frequency traders, DeFi architects, and a fresh cohort of institutional players. The protocol’s throughput isn’t mere bragging rights—it’s a magnet for capital and developer mindshare. Recent data shows Solana’s stablecoin issuance and tokenized asset volumes up double-digits year-on-year, with institutions dipping toes, if not diving in outright.

Myles O’Neil of Delta, offers a brisk summation: “If you host execution directly... that’s been proven to be very monetizable.” Yet the value equation is evolving. While Ethereum $ETH ( ▼ 0.4% ) still commands the narrative of decentralization, Solana’s blend of open and closed-source elements—praised by some, critiqued by others—underscores a pragmatic pivot. As Xavier (“0xave”) observes, Solana’s approach “allows for rapid innovation but raises real questions about decentralization and control.”

The fragmentation of Layer 1s signals not just a splintering, but a specialization. HyperLiquid $HYPE ( ▼ 7.03% ) and Avalanche $AVAX ( ▼ 2.95% ) punch into verticals where Solana does not yet preside, betting on unique communities and incentives. Meanwhile, entrenched voices like Mike Ippolito remind us, “This ETH monetary asset story is fully reliant on Bitcoin”—a subtle warning that even champions of innovation remain tethered to legacy narratives.

For allocators and architects alike, the message is clear: Layer 1s are not converging—they’re diverging by design.

Ethereum’s Layer 2 renaissance is less about technical wizardry and more about the structural engineering of future digital markets.

Nearly $37 billion is now secured by Ethereum Layer 2s—Arbitrum $ARB ( ▼ 3.8% ) , Optimism $OP ( ▼ 0.84% ) , and emerging plays like zkSync $ZK ( ▼ 1.31% ) —each vying to rewrite the throughput code of decentralized finance. “Ethereum doesn’t need reinvention, just repackaging,” says Michael Ippolito, likening Layer 2 scaling to Red Hat’s business model: capture the open-source ethos, sell reliability and scale.

But the procession isn’t without friction. A 1,000% quarterly surge in Ethereum smart contracts tells of developer conviction, yet it also signals a crowding effect—over two dozen competing L2s, many undifferentiated, all hungry for liquidity and developer mindshare. Myles O’Neil of Delta Network sees a bifurcation: “The dream formula, which ZK Sync is chasing, is monetizing hosted services with a recurring business. Models that blend speed and economic sustainability will endure.”

Consolidation now looms. Eliezer Ndinga at 21Shares forecasts an industry thinning, where Layer 2s that integrate seamlessly with both crypto-native and institutional rails will survive. As interoperability and capital efficiency become table stakes, the rest risk irrelevance—or worse, absorption.

The Layer 2 moment is as much about the architecture of the new internet as it is about risk-adjusted returns. If Ethereum’s mainnet was the opening act, its Layer 2s are setting the stage for how scale, competition, and network effects will shape crypto’s commercial frontier.

For DeFi, the next act isn’t about rebellion—it’s about relevance.

What began as an experiment in code and autonomy is maturing into “Neo Finance,” where DeFi interfaces directly with traditional markets and real-world assets. The scale is telling: stablecoin volumes now rival Visa, underscoring how blockchain rails aren’t just novel—they’re increasingly practical. Analyst Vance Spencer of Framework Ventures frames the trend sharply: “There are massive returns to scale...the democratization of being able to govern that is truly what I think the DeFi opportunity is.”

What’s emerging is less a replacement and more a convergence. Think hybrid models: protocols like Ondo $ONDO ( ▼ 5.23% ) and MakerDAO $SKY ( ▼ 4.5% ) , which connect on-chain liquidity to off-chain treasuries, or tokenized asset platforms luring the first waves of institutional capital. Michael Anderson, also of Framework, underscores the shift: “It’s not decentralization for decentralization’s sake. Users don’t want to self-custody in a lot of ways.” This pragmatic fusion puts business utility at the center—yield rooted in cash flow, not just code.

Still, the optimists don’t have the last word. Jordi Alexander of Selini Capital offers a measured note of caution: “You need to know what risks you’re taking...these instruments are interesting for sure.” The message: sustainable yield demands transparency—and not all protocols will clear that bar.

If “Web3” was a vision, Neo Finance is the implementation phase—where institutional capital meets crypto’s open architecture, and risk management replaces maximalist dogma.

Crypto’s next growth engine may come with a neural net: AI is threading its way into blockchains, and the world’s most conservative capital is following close behind.

Inflows tell the story. Bank of America now permits advisors to allocate up to 4% of client portfolios to crypto. That may sound modest, but as Upexi CEO Alan Marshall notes, “Trillions and trillions of dollars of actual inflows... that 4% is a lot.” It’s a marked break from banking dogma—and a signal that digital assets are courting the scale only institutions can provide.

Yet in the global bazaar of AI and crypto, orthodoxy is giving way to open-source experimentation. Xavier (“0xave”) raises the prospect of a decentralized AI ecosystem where models, data, and incentives align across the chain: “Open sourcing AI, using incentives, aligning contributors to the ecosystem, [could be] huge in the long, long term.” This vision reimagines not just AI’s architecture but its very mode of economic participation—potentially creating a marketplace for intelligence, as liquid as any crypto token.

Cautiously optimistic, Myles O’Neil of Delta voices the counterpoint: the early phase of AI–crypto startups is likely headed for “consolidation.” The SaaS-style revenues favored by today’s projects may not mesh with open, composable protocols. The winners will be those who can navigate both code and capital formation as the tide of institutional assets rises.

If crypto’s past decade was driven by code, its next may be defined by the convergence of code and cognition. For investors eyeing the future, the question is no longer whether to bet on AI or crypto—but how to capture value at their joint frontier.

Working on something for tax season — a no-BS crypto tax guide with real calculations and clear examples. Reply if you'd actually use this.

Enjoy Meridian? Forward today’s issue to a friend or colleague who follows crypto markets.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments are speculative and involve significant risk. Please conduct your own research and consult with a financial professional before making any investment decisions.